A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out concerning potential neighbours more than the construction of the wall in a coastal website in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted nationwide notice subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed loved ones property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of preparing breaches, environmental considerations, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier as well as the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced into a very publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development functions at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and an organization director respectively, look for to build their family home. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Eire’s coastline, in which improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of set up inhabitants. According to the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining produced by their potential neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted underneath arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally residents of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their arranging permission by creating a wall beyond the boundaries of their web page, resulting in an encroachment with a Unique Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore locations are subject matter to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological outcomes, especially in a very delicate coastal atmosphere for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their organizing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partially crafted, is in the proper situation. Their lawful workforce has characterised the motion as an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The few accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their view, an allegation that has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, in which views of the sea are each extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic endeavours via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-large water during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods, an image which includes due to the fact turn out to be emblematic in the depth with the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were being intended to gather Visible proof in the wall’s situation relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website through the sea Irish Instances noted, describing how The 2 Guys entered the h2o for the duration of severe weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm water to photograph the internet site became Among the most striking descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Times write-up about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this sort of actions ended up cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall extended into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were protected in detail with the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 grew to become extensively searched phrases as viewers sought to be familiar with the background and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further more submissions on regardless of whether interim orders must be granted to halt design pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital second within the legal timeline.
In the Main of your dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage which the wall, as created, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling paperwork, maps, and situations hooked up to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their action is determined by problem for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public view, insisting in its place that it is about making sure that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they've got explained their prolonged-standing relationship to the realm as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On Rene Collier another side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a few simply just wanting to establish a loved ones household in accordance With all the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Exclusive Area of Conservation and say that all performs have been carried out determined by Experienced advice and accepted strategies. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with entering The ocean during a storm, usually do not change the underlying details.
The case has also raised broader questions on how scheduling disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than building of wall at coastal website is now a shorthand description for any circumstance that a lot of observers see as more and more typical. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation amongst private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become much more contentious.
The Irish Situations posting about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Earlier been involved in area advocacy on setting up and environmental troubles, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Moments protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of midsection-large drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Times and René Collier waded by means of midsection-high drinking water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality with the coastline as well as symbolic nature of the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme technique.
As being the High Court proceedings continue on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom have to establish if the wall as created complies with arranging permission and no matter if any encroachment into a Particular Location of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and scheduling disorders. Nevertheless the human factor remains central: neighbours who must Are living along with each other extensive following the legal costs are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design will work at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, although the implications of the case prolong past that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. It also underscores how speedily a local disagreement can escalate when basic issues for example environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of organic magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre with the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. Regardless of whether it can ultimately be altered, eliminated, or accomplished as prepared will rely upon the court docket’s results. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will likely carry on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most carefully watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.